Dallas Buckley, The South of Animals admin calls any opposition to Michael Chour, Tan Chour and The Sound of Animals, liars, thieves, trolls

 

 

SOA admin Dallas Buckley doesn't have 1 original thought of her own, despite claiming to have "letters after her name". 

 

Her ramblings in a recent post are demonstrative of a very poor grasp of the real world and how it functions. She also claims the opposition to Michael Chour spearheading SOA are now psychopaths, people with borderline personality and are narcissists. 

 

It's amazing that Buckley can come up with such an outrageous "diagnosis" since most of the people who have found out the truth about Chour are from completely different countries and span thousands of people. People Buckley has never even met are labeled as psychopaths, flying monkeys, trolls etc. 

 

Her post is because I wrote that Michael Chour is a malignant narcissist, which he is by classic definition.

 

Moving on, Buckley's commentary is far beyond anything that is the truth and most certainly isn't remotely believable. 

 

For instance she wrote that the Palfrey family gave thousands upon thousands of Pounds as "an investment" to purchase the land and build an animal rescue on it.  Now consider this. Highly intelligent, successful people don't "invest" in an animal rescue organization. They invest in stocks, bonds, currencies etc. Buckley wants you to believe that business savvy individuals thought they were going to make money from The Blue Dream Shelter run with donations!!!! Did you actually write that Buckley? For an allegedly educated person yourself, you certainly write the biggest load of hogwash I've ever seen.

Then Buckley refers to the "Chief puppeteer"  I can only assume she is talking about the Palfrey family here. You know the family that gave 350,000 Pounds to Michael Chour, believing every lie he fed to them. How dare she bash these kind-hearted souls? 

 

Maybe if Buckley had given 350,000 Pounds of her own money she would want to know where it was all disappearing to? And in the end, most of that money disappeared because we all subsequently found out Michael Chour NEVER bought the land on which Blue Dream was built!!!! For those who cannot work out what a staggering amount of money that is, we've done the homework for you :

 

£350,000 = 13,926,620 Thai Baht

£350,000 = $461,651

£350,000 = €391,799

 

She also claims "there was a plan to oust the founder who they claimed only worked there". If this is indeed true, who could blame them? They believed a pathological liar posing as a dog meat rescuer was fleecing them for as much money as he could get his grubby little hands on. Every day, multiple times a day, Chour repeatedly asked about the tally of donations in the Paypal account. We have all the evidence of this. If anyone would like to see if for themselves, please leave a message here and we will upload the imagery.  Like every 5 minutes. The requested donations were being used for such things as "the police are after me and blackmailing me so I need to pay them off". The Palfrey family bought it all, hook, line and sinker!

 

After many months I don't doubt that the Palfrey family and many other people wanted Chour gone. Especially after more and more independent claims against Chour were brought out into the public arena. 

 

A classic example is that Chour posed as a Vet, a Virologist and a Doctor. All evidence of this has been kept by a multitude of individuals. Then complaints were made by staff and volunteers. Trust me when I say that they did not collude or conspire to tarnish and damage Chour's reputation. He did that all on his own as the witnesses chose to speak out because they couldn't bare to see any more atrocities being perpetrated by Chour.

 

Classic examples are :

 

(a) Locking staff in cages

 

(b) Diagnosing and dispensing medication to volunteers and staff

 

(c) Murdering 25 dogs for allegedly having rabies and videotaping these monstrous incidents and then turning it all into an opportunity to obtain more donations

 

(d) Punching dogs in the face and biting dogs who had attacked other dogs as punishment

 

(e) Driving into Cambodia to frequent prostitutes and gamble donations away

 

(f) Stay in luxury 4 star hotels, buy rounds of drinks for people in a bar and order oysters from the menu

 

(g) Purchased dogs from dog butchers, by prior arrangement, fueling the trade in dog meat and using the opportunity to be videotaped so that he could be seen as some kind of hero/savior

 

(h) Stole the money that was given for the purchase of the land and tripled invoices for the buildings costs of the Blue Dream Shelter.

Actually the list is endless and I could go on for another hour just highlighting Chour's appalling behavior and complete lack of conscience and ethics.

 

According to Buckley there was a team standing by to take over the Blue Dream Shelter "not because they loved the dogs but they were protecting their investment"! Yes the Palfrey family saw an animal welfare organization as an "investment"! They built a shelter in the back woods of Thailand and hoped to become millionaires as a result!  

 

Why the heck did the already wealthy Palfrey family give Chour 350,000 Pounds of their own money? Because they didn't love dogs and didn't want to make a difference to the dogs in the dog meat trade right?  Totally believable story, right? Pull the other one!

 

And then there's the matter of Chour's "work visa" (or lack thereof) which might be a bit of a problem, right? Chour is indeed working and making a ton of money for himself because you know, the SOA admin team have encouraged donors to pay donations directly into Chour's private PayPal account and/or his private bank account. We have all the evidence. All of this is illegal on many levels.

 

Also, SOA claimed Chour was cleared of tax evasion.  Chour wasn't "cleared" of tax evasion. He was punished and had to pay Thai authorities 50,000 Pounds!!!! Now can you work out what Michael Chour's annual income had to be in order to pay 50,000 Pounds in personal taxes. How and where does Chour get his hands on that kind of money? Maybe from his supposed Doctor's pension??

Highly doubt Thai authorities are just going to look the other way when this all comes to a head in February 2021 when the case against Chour will be adjudicated by the Attorney General. And yes people there is indeed a criminal case pending against Chour for animal cruelty, posing as a veterinarian, euthanizing dogs and fraud. The criminal case number is 318/2652.

And yes Tanyanan Chour was charged with assaulting Sutirak Irwindale and yes she is on probation. SOA are lying to you.

 

And are the rumors true that Chour totes a gun? That would be highly criminal in Thailand. Seems multiple people saw that gun. Oh and we have the evidence. Chour should be worried, very worried. 

 

The truth remains the truth no matter what spin you try and put on it. So call us whatever names you want to but please try and be original and have thoughts of your very own. Everyone is curious why SOA and their Admin team are coming out to bat for Michael and Tan Chour. Is money changing hands at this junction? Because no real animal lover or rescuer would continue to pretend that none of the allegations against Chour are true. 

 

And have you no care about the innocent, already highly traumatized dog meat survivors Chour murdered as a marketing ploy to raise additional donations? Seems someone is green not with envy but with money!